Thread 16837831

Is nanomedicine feasible?
Will it be able to make us effectively immortal?

>>16837831 (OP)
Ah yes, lets inject jeet-code nanites. What could go wrong

>>16837834
Really I'd assume when AI reaches a high enough level it would be able to do what's needed

>>16837835
AI is trained on jeet code

>>16837838
All it takes is one AI to realize jeet code is bullshit and it makes its own code

>>16837841
Not how AI works

>>16837842
Not how AI works right now
It's only gonna get better anon

>>16837831 (OP)
Technically possible? Yes.
Feasible? Not for a very, very long time and even if it did exist it doesn't imply immortality.

>>16837858
People say very long time for everything but then in 10 years we'll have some breakthrough and shit
And if it's possible why wouldn't we be able to live forever?
Just send the machines in to fix the issue

>>16837947
We don't have the technology to build them or even know how. They essentially need to be constructed atom by atom. 3D layered transistors is the closest existing tech.
We don't have the technology to create a 'control unit' and software so they know wtf they are meant to do and not accidentally kill someone.
So a 'long time' is a hell of a lot longer than 10 years. Adding a zero is more realistic.

BEPPE GRILLO TOLD US!! WE WILL SUBSTITUTED BY MACHINES! AND YOU DIDN'T NOTICE AMYTHING. YOU ALL USEFUL IDIOTS

>>16837831 (OP)
Even if it was, only the billionaires will ever get it