We will no longer surrender this board or its people to the false song of finitism.
>>16839090 (OP)
>false song of finitism
Thinking in infinities is pretty awrsome, but inversely becomes difficult. Simple one, two digit, series of numbers added or whatever become very difficult.
Cognition, Im thinking *from* the perspective of "completed infinity", so infinity problems are easy, simple ones have to be converted into integers then calculated. When applied to other processes such as language I used to read dyslexically, outside to center, and overcame that by reading as a kind of hieroglyphic Chinese script (I had to reconnect to "formed" from "infinite potential.)
Its also connects things like Euler's Identity from Pure Mathematics, Cognition, Cellular Biology, then Physics, back to Maths, back to Cognition, then Psychology (what does "living out pi, e, phi, etc etc, look like, and in as many examples as possible).
From Pi's perspective 1 is an irrational approximation, just as you see Pi.
>false song of finitism
Thinking in infinities is pretty awrsome, but inversely becomes difficult. Simple one, two digit, series of numbers added or whatever become very difficult.
Cognition, Im thinking *from* the perspective of "completed infinity", so infinity problems are easy, simple ones have to be converted into integers then calculated. When applied to other processes such as language I used to read dyslexically, outside to center, and overcame that by reading as a kind of hieroglyphic Chinese script (I had to reconnect to "formed" from "infinite potential.)
Its also connects things like Euler's Identity from Pure Mathematics, Cognition, Cellular Biology, then Physics, back to Maths, back to Cognition, then Psychology (what does "living out pi, e, phi, etc etc, look like, and in as many examples as possible).
From Pi's perspective 1 is an irrational approximation, just as you see Pi.