>>16839760 (OP)
>>16839791
nobody actually 'knows' these things, scientists create models to predict things. every scientist knows models are just models and that they can be disproven at any given moment, but that's good. that's what science is. of course you'll have individuals arguing for certain models but an actual professional is never going to say something is 100% certain
I doubt you'll respond but can you tell me where you get these opinions from? I see so many people like you two online now and you're all uneducated as fuck when it comes to what science truly is on a professional and intellectual level. do you get your opinions from clickbait journalism, bad science communication, conspiracy/esoteric slop influencers, etc?