← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16839760

14 posts 4 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16839760 [Report] >>16839778 >>16839791 >>16840354 >>16841571
>Science can't explain this but it supposedly knows about what was going on a fraction of a second after the Big Bang

Lmao, you actually believe that?
Anonymous No.16839778 [Report] >>16840341 >>16840444 >>16841572
>>16839760 (OP)
AI pic
Ball lightning is a myth and has never actually been documented
Anonymous No.16839791 [Report] >>16840354 >>16840386
>>16839760 (OP)
scientists are always making claims which can't be called into dispute, its probably their biggest rhetorical trick
>i know what happened a million year ago and you can't prove me wrong because i know you don't have a time machine
>i know whats at the center of the sun and you can't prove me wrong because i know nobody has ever seen the center of the sun
they're just a bunch of stupid liar, they lie about everything
Anonymous No.16840341 [Report]
>>16839778
https://youtu.be/dMsGHmGxyxo?si=kTh6Tqo4kZlYxIxd
it can also be reproduced in the lab. come join us in the 21st century
Anonymous No.16840354 [Report] >>16840429
>>16839760 (OP)
>>16839791
nobody actually 'knows' these things, scientists create models to predict things. every scientist knows models are just models and that they can be disproven at any given moment, but that's good. that's what science is. of course you'll have individuals arguing for certain models but an actual professional is never going to say something is 100% certain

I doubt you'll respond but can you tell me where you get these opinions from? I see so many people like you two online now and you're all uneducated as fuck when it comes to what science truly is on a professional and intellectual level. do you get your opinions from clickbait journalism, bad science communication, conspiracy/esoteric slop influencers, etc?
Anonymous No.16840386 [Report]
>>16839791
It's true. I've yet to see a scientist who hasn't lied about everything.
Anonymous No.16840397 [Report] >>16841563
speaking of lightning balls, i read something interesting recently in a /k/ black project thread which may or may not be tangentially related to this

an anon was talking about "new physics" research which takes place in top US research institutions like sandia and the rowland institute (among others), which receive funding directly from the departments of defense and energy. one of the researchers that popped up was a guy called robert w. hellwarth, one of the pioneers of the laser. the thread went further into talking about lasers and it got to the point where the term "laser induced plasma filament" was mentioned. it turns out that the US navy has been developing this technology using his research to create real, physical tic tac-shaped plasma objects in three dimensional space and supposedly that's what's all of these recent internet UFOs/UAPs are. it would explain why the US navy is often nearby when they appear

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDSVJfuyJlk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYr3zPP5rCw

sorry for sort of derailing the thread, i just found it noteworthy
Anonymous No.16840429 [Report] >>16841613
>>16840354
+1
Anonymous No.16840444 [Report]
>>16839778
Anonymous No.16841563 [Report] >>16841577
>>16840397
Blue beam was an operation designation, it's not literally a blue beam.
Anonymous No.16841571 [Report]
>>16839760 (OP)
We left that first fractuon of a second for you, God, Da Pope, and the rest of the Philosophers to have. It is yours to do with as you please.
And like any gift from a white man, we may take some or all or that moment back as we see fit.
Anonymous No.16841572 [Report]
>>16839778
Uh, that's The Moon, Anon. The Moon is a solid ball of lightning. We've been there and brought pieces back.
Anonymous No.16841577 [Report]
>>16841563
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYr3zPP5rCw
Anonymous No.16841613 [Report]
>>16840429
Not an argument.