← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16840325

12 posts 16 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16840325 [Report]
>bi-directional rotors are very ineficient
you were saying?
Anonymous No.16840326 [Report]
lin-q
https://www.youtube.com/live/9u5i0t-Nr_w?si=OG6_RPxrNndNZOMf&t=5902
Anonymous No.16840328 [Report] >>16840485
and off course, the superior alternative, for recreational use, and also military use
t. I know there needs to be a front propeller to compensate
Anonymous No.16840462 [Report]
amerin*g*ers, I kneel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqXCHkByZKY
Anonymous No.16840469 [Report]
it's ok I guess
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHVHSoEPljw
Anonymous No.16840474 [Report]
and then there's these niggers sleeping on the coolest bike prototype of them all, from a company with potential too
"speeder" is the name of the baiku which is in sleep mode
Anonymous No.16840482 [Report]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2I6HQcqO7c
the jets and the one after it, worthy prototypes


all of these get my approval
Anonymous No.16840485 [Report]
what says (You), did my 0$ prototype outdo them all?
>>16840328
Anonymous No.16841410 [Report] >>16842458
nobody likes flying cars or what? this is a very strange phenomena, one would think everyone loves flying cars
Anonymous No.16842458 [Report]
>>16841410
People only like what they are brainwashed into wanting.
Anonymous No.16842463 [Report] >>16842662
Is there any consensus on what would be the safest type of aircraft?
Dave No.16842662 [Report]
>>16842463
It's all extremely dangerous at it's core... As a personal vehicle that won't get enough maintenance