← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16841802

27 posts 8 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16841802 [Report] >>16842022 >>16842168 >>16842209
Why can't this be made?
Anonymous No.16841805 [Report] >>16841816
tf am I looking at
Anonymous No.16841816 [Report] >>16841823
>>16841805
A translucent pane that "removes color" from the light that passes through.
Anonymous No.16841823 [Report] >>16841834
>>16841816
It’s called a polarizer and you’re looking at one right now on your screen
Anonymous No.16841834 [Report] >>16841913
>>16841823
A polarizer does not desaturate color.
Anonymous No.16841913 [Report] >>16842007 >>16842117
>>16841834
Explain how you think a monochrome display works
Anonymous No.16842007 [Report] >>16842025
>>16841913
Please read the red text in the image of the opening post and give me a rough sketch of some of your ideas about what this text could mean.
Anonymous No.16842022 [Report] >>16842045
>>16841802 (OP)
Because perception of color saturation is a biological effect, not an optical one.
Anonymous No.16842025 [Report] >>16842039
>>16842007
You are looking for a monochromatic polarizer irl. Or you’re looking for a JavaScript snippet that chatgpt can shit out for you to convert rgb to raw pixel intensity and output in b/w.
Anonymous No.16842039 [Report] >>16842100
>>16842025
I never heard about a monochromatic polarizer. Please, enlighten me. Is this a kind of sheet I put in front of whatever i am looking at and it gives me a monochromatic version of what I am looking at, without drawing any additional power in order to do so?
Anonymous No.16842045 [Report]
>>16842022
Perception of pain is a biological effect and I can craft a blade that results in this effect.
Anonymous No.16842100 [Report] >>16842134 >>16842139
>>16842039
Yes. Polarization occurs passively. Do you think a polar lens fitted over a camera draws power to achieve a greyscale effect? You are such a faggot by the way you type
Anonymous No.16842117 [Report]
>>16841913
It's monochrome because polarizer together with liquid crystals simply blocks the color that goes from the background of display. And colored display has series of such monochromatic pixels, each one with individual color filter.
Anonymous No.16842134 [Report]
>>16842100
Please show me a video of a polarization fiter totally removing all saturation from the light passing through. I'd like to see something akin to the picture I initially posted.
Anonymous No.16842139 [Report] >>16842171 >>16842176
>>16842100
This is what I find when I google "polar lens". It darkens the image somewhat, as expected, because it removes light with a certain polarization. Removing saturation altogether: Not so much.
Anonymous No.16842168 [Report]
>>16841802 (OP)
Absence of color is actually a presence of 3 frequencies - R G and B at the intensities perceived by our eye as equal.

So what I would do here.
1. First we need to split this image into 3 using half-reflecting mirrors or prisms.
2. Then for image G we keep color as it is. For R we need to shift spectrum to red side, by reducing frequencies, for B we need to shift it to blue side, by increasing frequencies.
3. Then adjust intensity of those images using gray filters and unite them into one with prisms and mirrors.

How do we implement step 2?
- It could be done using photoelectric shit, but it's not truly passive.
- It also could be implemented using fluorescent screens. Project picture on such screen, obtain weak emitted light of changed frequency from other side. Is it passive enough?
- Using nonlinear crystals. For that we need to split image into spectrum and use only specific frequencies (like in spectrophotometry). Although true gray color is hard to obtain, I guess we could approximate it closely.
Anonymous No.16842171 [Report] >>16842180
>>16842139
Dude never heard of Polaroid glasses.
Anonymous No.16842176 [Report] >>16842180
>>16842139
Really? I find a massive selection on Amazon that you attach onto your camera. No batteries required. I think you may just be retarded
Anonymous No.16842180 [Report] >>16842184
>>16842171
>>16842176
I get it, trolling can feel rewarding. I just don't understand why you would choose such a weak bait, I mean almost everyone had polarization filters/lenses/glasses in their hands and know you are full of shit.
But, by all means, keep doubling down, retard.
Anonymous No.16842184 [Report] >>16842185 >>16842187
>>16842180
Have you watched any film before 1930? You think their photography was done in post? Kick rocks kid.
Anonymous No.16842185 [Report] >>16842190
>>16842184
Anonymous No.16842187 [Report] >>16842193 >>16842197
>>16842184
"... and double down the retard did."
Anonymous No.16842190 [Report]
>>16842185
Youre the dumbest nigger on this board. I already explained how this works to you. Open up a black and white image on your computer. Tear off the polarizing filter on your monitor. It’s all white. Dumbfuck pajeet.
Anonymous No.16842193 [Report]
>>16842187
>reading this in Morgan Freeman's voice
Anonymous No.16842197 [Report]
>>16842187
You don’t need to sign your posts
Anonymous No.16842209 [Report]
>>16841802 (OP)
anything that measures intensity does this, tho
Anonymous No.16842419 [Report]
please tell me this thread is all bots and nobody is this retarded