>>4444415
>would you get a different setup if you were just starting out today
If you can get an E‑M5 Mark III or newer, it’s likely a better long-term investment—especially when it comes to resale value. The battery system hasn't changed since the Mark III, which means original batteries should remain available for a while (they still do for the old body). You'll also appreciate the improved grip and ergonomics. The higher resolution of the Mark III can be helpful for cropping, which is useful in macro photography. Stabilization differences probably won’t be dramatic—unless you're using Pro lenses, where it can make more of a difference (I believe). That said, the Mark II is still an excellent first camera to learn on, especially if you are unsure if youll like the hobby. It includes more computational features than most people will ever need or use. Get a 3rd party screw on grip for it though. It can take years to fully outgrow it, and even then, the improvements in newer bodies may not feel significant (though I can’t say for sure, since I haven’t owned one). Ultimately, the lens is the most important investment in macro. For Olympus, the 60mm f/2.8 is the standout option. If you can get that lens, the camera body becomes less critical—you can always upgrade the body later. The 30mm macro is also a nice lens, but it's not ideal for insects. You’ll need to get much closer to your subject, which can be tricky, though it does offer a unique look I I fucking love it: see review: https://youtu.be/TGvTNzWYN6Q