>>11346221
>"walls of text" has connotations of "bad, therefore wrong"
Fair enough, but I was only refering to the amount of text not the quality. Stuff like that is all so specific and niche that I just enjoy to see it, even if it's not really my personal taste. That said, your updated version is so much easier to read, at least for me lol
>taboo at best, and conventionally gross content at worst
90% of the gens here balance on the thin line between tabboo/interesting and gross quite well. And your edit is not very fappable to me personally but at least very entertaning to read. I'm just having fun and I love me some quality gooner cringe, and I mean that in the most complimenting and positive way hahaha.
>provide such feedback if you can
I feel like there are other boards and threads that know more about typestting and writing but sure, I'll complain again if you post an edit itt that I can't read hahaha But to be prefectly honest I only commented in the first place because it was a gen of mine and caught my attention but my eyes are shit in general so I get easily triggered when I have trouble reading something on a screen. Nothing personal ofc. And I don't know how other anons feel about captions but it's at least interesting to read once in a while.
>only my third caption, so i'm an inexperienced caption make
Right, I somehow forgot that, sorry. I just could've been more construcitve with my first comment right away. For example the white text in >>11346090 works quite well with the dark bg but I didn't like the gen so I didn't feel like commenting. But since I've been rambling about goonercringe might aswell compliment that anon too for the 10/10 comedy lol.
>>11346244
>fat futa Astolfo
I feel like that's a first for /ddg/. If you fixed the hand it'd be perfect lmao.