Search Results
7/9/2025, 8:50:11 PM
>>105849467
>what is caching
2025 and /g/ still doesn't know this
>>105848473
>5800x is pretty much the same as a 5700x you dumb fuck
Except it isn't price-wise and even then, both don't have an igpu. So idgaf.
>inb4 it's only barely more expensive than the 5700x
Not in my country.
>well if you truly care about being able to play games at 5 fps while your dgpu is broken, get a gt 1030 then? it'll mog your vega 3 or 7 or whatever it is
my igpu literally performs better than any of the cheapo 30 series gpus you fucking retard
https://youtu.be/LnHg3kPRerA
>the clocks and tdp are literally the same, plus you could power limit the 5700x to 45w or something like that and it would beat the 5700g while drawing less power because again, double the l3 cache
yes you dimwit, the clocks are the same BUT the higher the clocks (while the cpu is in high load), the higher the temps.
I limit this cpu to 3.8~4GHz to avoid high temps and I did try it out without limits and the performance difference from 4GHz to ~4.6 is simply not worth it. It was about a ~3-4 FPS diff in cyberpunk and TLoU.
Also, no you dumbfuck, more cache isn't necessarily going to make your cpu perform better in games. I have literally dozens of examples where this isn't the case. IPC is way more relevant. A 35MB cache xeon 2690v4 gets mogged by a 16MB 5700x in any cpu-bound game. Just go look these up on counter strike.
>yeah that's how you show differences in cpu performance... by making the cpu the bottleneck
your argument is basically "yeah they perform the exact same as long as i'm not cpu bound", by that logic you could've gotten a 3400g or worse cpu
Aspie, tell me: who the fuck is buying a 1080 to run games in 720p? go ahead. "B-but muh theoreticals". REAL world scenario dumbass, both cpus get tied in most games and the games where this doesn't happen already run at over 120/240 FPS because they're either old, cpu-bound, competitive titles or a combination of all 3.
>what is caching
2025 and /g/ still doesn't know this
>>105848473
>5800x is pretty much the same as a 5700x you dumb fuck
Except it isn't price-wise and even then, both don't have an igpu. So idgaf.
>inb4 it's only barely more expensive than the 5700x
Not in my country.
>well if you truly care about being able to play games at 5 fps while your dgpu is broken, get a gt 1030 then? it'll mog your vega 3 or 7 or whatever it is
my igpu literally performs better than any of the cheapo 30 series gpus you fucking retard
https://youtu.be/LnHg3kPRerA
>the clocks and tdp are literally the same, plus you could power limit the 5700x to 45w or something like that and it would beat the 5700g while drawing less power because again, double the l3 cache
yes you dimwit, the clocks are the same BUT the higher the clocks (while the cpu is in high load), the higher the temps.
I limit this cpu to 3.8~4GHz to avoid high temps and I did try it out without limits and the performance difference from 4GHz to ~4.6 is simply not worth it. It was about a ~3-4 FPS diff in cyberpunk and TLoU.
Also, no you dumbfuck, more cache isn't necessarily going to make your cpu perform better in games. I have literally dozens of examples where this isn't the case. IPC is way more relevant. A 35MB cache xeon 2690v4 gets mogged by a 16MB 5700x in any cpu-bound game. Just go look these up on counter strike.
>yeah that's how you show differences in cpu performance... by making the cpu the bottleneck
your argument is basically "yeah they perform the exact same as long as i'm not cpu bound", by that logic you could've gotten a 3400g or worse cpu
Aspie, tell me: who the fuck is buying a 1080 to run games in 720p? go ahead. "B-but muh theoreticals". REAL world scenario dumbass, both cpus get tied in most games and the games where this doesn't happen already run at over 120/240 FPS because they're either old, cpu-bound, competitive titles or a combination of all 3.
Page 1