>>81656878
>again, grasping at straws. anything could be defined as "a hypothesis that can only be right as fiction contained to itself." again, doesn't prevent us from doing science.
science has empirical value you can feel even before you can conceptualize.

>hens don't count chickens in the sense that human beings do, they just happen to have cognitive abilities that emerged according to their evolutionary history
humans arrived to formalizations through embodied cognition empiricism exactly just like this.

>on the contrary it holds to scrutiny too well
if you're interested in being it's representative, you have to address the fact that that nihilism is fundamentally underdeveloped and unfit to actually assess life as a whole: >>81656460
>logic shatters its relevance when it's taken to its logical conclusion of it being a tool for life. you never took logics to its extremes so you're where you are. nihilism posits "meaninglesnees" from a complex system where meaningfulness exists as an opposite.

random comment: funny how nietzsche is known by normies as nihilist when he actually pointed out that I had pointed out