Search Results
6/9/2025, 6:15:56 PM
>>63805018
US arms trials, innovation and acquisition from 1880s to 1940s was anywhere between pants on head retarded and groundbreakingly ahead of its time.
Its why you had people in charge demanding that rifles should have magazine cutoffs well into when they had become irrelevant. People sperging out about licensing and lawsuits.
By the time the M1 was up for debate everyone was pretty done with being ridiculously thorough, saw something that was marginally better than the Pederson and was like, "that, lets do that".
No one had it in them anymore to drag their feet on stupid points. And the niggers that did that were dead, mainly the ante-bellum late 1890s command structure. Im generalizing a bit and the Brits did a fair bit of this too. But you get the idea
US arms trials, innovation and acquisition from 1880s to 1940s was anywhere between pants on head retarded and groundbreakingly ahead of its time.
Its why you had people in charge demanding that rifles should have magazine cutoffs well into when they had become irrelevant. People sperging out about licensing and lawsuits.
By the time the M1 was up for debate everyone was pretty done with being ridiculously thorough, saw something that was marginally better than the Pederson and was like, "that, lets do that".
No one had it in them anymore to drag their feet on stupid points. And the niggers that did that were dead, mainly the ante-bellum late 1890s command structure. Im generalizing a bit and the Brits did a fair bit of this too. But you get the idea
Page 1