>>280777220
Find me easier synonyms for the words i used that you declared big words. They must have the same definitions. There is a reason i use a certain word to describe a certain thing. I prefer simple language when available.

The problem of evil is not only a subject in philosophy of religion, its also a subject in ethics. I spoke of ethics in my posts, this should be obvious. Do you even understand what youre talking about?

No, i said
>Yes, the point being who was the monster? The ''altruistic'' character actually fucks shit up even more from a consequentialist perspective, yet we cannot exactly call his empathy wrong since the whole story is about what happens when people lack just that virtue. Him saving Johan is the action that ironically proves Tenma to be right. Johan wanted Tenma to kill him so Johan could be proven right. Thus, psychological egoism is heavily implied making Tenma a very flawed and complex character. His journey isn't about the greater good, its about him trying to prove to himself the value system he holds is correct. Thats purposeful and subversive, not bad writing.
So, no. It was not a premise i was arguing for.

And yes, you shouldn't feel like arguing about philosophy. You clearly cant.