>>64095299
>I have a hard believing most modern firearms being submitted for procurement are the result of a single person, yet alone a single engineer.
If you think IWI has some master engineering team with flat integration of world class SOF to shit out the carmel , bro do I have some news for you
>Mikhail and Eugene weren't working solo, neither was Gaston or Browning.
No not at all, but they owned the projects and worked to meet the needs of a customer/govt trial that sat at a higher position in the hierarchy. By contrast the SCAR program was directly interwoven with the units who would end up using it.
>"heres my ar15 I think it meets your requirements, please adopt it"
vs
>actively working to refine the rifle with the customer and willing to tear up tooling to do so
Colt, KAC and others submitted basically straight AR15s and told the govt to bend to meet them. No different than glock submitting "You can have a glock 19 and glock 17" for a modular handgun contract.

>tldr - cope scars are rifles shot into the dark hoping to meet some future requirements, fn scar was end product of a specific rifle development program
>>64095304
>Doesnt have bots to hype his posts