>>102497453
Enabling women to keep streaming as anime girls and entertaining me? I sure hope so that was the whole idea

>>101990093
>They should enforce a rule prohibiting former company members from debuting as indies
How? Unless she says 'Hi, my real name is X' onstream, Cover has literally no legally admissable evidence.
See, 'actual' legal systems don't work like the Twitter-witchhunt arena where the accuser is automatically assumed to be correct. It's the opposite. The defendent, in fact, is in the right by default and the plaintiff needs to present evidence before a case can even go to court.

There almost certainly is something like that in their contracts already, but it's completely unenforcable.