Search Results
8/4/2025, 7:25:45 PM
>>512216873
Bro, that's pure COPE.
You can't rewrite 1616 and 1633 like it's fanfiction. The Church literally declared heliocentrism 'formally heretical' not just because of tone or insults, but because it contradicted Scripture. That's not 'censoring personal attacks'. That's suppressing science with theology.
>In 1616 the Inquisition declared heliocentrism to be both scientifically indefensible and heretical
>found "vehemently suspect of heresy" for following the position of Copernicus, which is contrary to the true sense and authority of Holy Scripture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_affair
Galileo was banned from teaching it, Copernicus's De revolutionibus was censored, and even Kepler's work got banned despite Kepler being a devout Christian. If this was just about Galileo being rude, why did Kepler's Epitome get yeeted too?
Because science ≠ doctrine back then (that is a symbol, might not show up properly here), and the Church didn't like being contradicted.
Bro, that's pure COPE.
You can't rewrite 1616 and 1633 like it's fanfiction. The Church literally declared heliocentrism 'formally heretical' not just because of tone or insults, but because it contradicted Scripture. That's not 'censoring personal attacks'. That's suppressing science with theology.
>In 1616 the Inquisition declared heliocentrism to be both scientifically indefensible and heretical
>found "vehemently suspect of heresy" for following the position of Copernicus, which is contrary to the true sense and authority of Holy Scripture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_affair
Galileo was banned from teaching it, Copernicus's De revolutionibus was censored, and even Kepler's work got banned despite Kepler being a devout Christian. If this was just about Galileo being rude, why did Kepler's Epitome get yeeted too?
Because science ≠ doctrine back then (that is a symbol, might not show up properly here), and the Church didn't like being contradicted.
Page 1