>>24532196
I already addressed this:
>an ideologically motivated spree killer is able to use means other than guns to harm people
But even then, my argument has not collapsed, you are pretending to apply it consistently when in reality you either don't understand it or are willfully misrepresenting it
I have said:
>I believe cultures should derive utility from the principles they hold dear
This implies a process in which the pros and cons of a "principle" are analyzed and contrasted, and the fact remains that placed into balance, the life of a potential victim that is saved through the usage of legally owned guns is worth more than any potential enjoyment i could derive from using 4chan, obviously. And even though firearms could be misused in a variety of ways, the propaganda that is spread here motivates people to misuse them in the first place, the underlying issue is that they want to kill people in accordance to the ideological imprinting they experienced in here, that or they want to mutilate their genitals, or that they want to kill themselves because they will never fuck or be a woman, or they fall into porn addiction, that or they congregate to come up with strategies for grooming minors. The ways in which a website as influential as this harms society are much more perverse and insidious.
Who wants to live in a society where that is possible? Free speech was not conceived to be this, and at any rate, what i am suggesting is not a ban on free speech, but mere restrictions that make all these processes not impossible but much less likely.