>>212554019
Europe from the 1950s-1990s.!
>Different Militaries
>Different Currencies
>Different political parties and ideologies
>Different economic systems
>Different cultures
>Different musics
>Different cuisines and consumer products
>Different religions
>Different races and ethnicities but all Europeans
>No brown and black people
What was so wrong with this that they needed to become EU?
>b-b-but dey wuz all SMOL n IRRELEVANT n sheeit
Think logically. Were they….really?
>UK, France, Italy, West Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Portugal
Some of the richest, most powerful countries in the whole world in all manners -influence on global culture, technology, wealth, military, the economy, etc.
>Sweden Norway Denmark Finland Iceland
Hyper-advanced Nordics
>USSR
A superpower
>Yugoslavia, Albania, Romania
Meaningfully non-aligned countries which were exemplifiers of nationalism and self-reliance
>Poland, Hungary, Czhcekoslvokia, East Germany
An efficient industrial zone
>Ireland, Greece
Culturally significant and noteworthy
>Switerland
A global banking hub
>Vatican City
The spiritual center of the biggest religion on earth

Meanwhile, the “EU” today is just a copy of Seattle applied to a whole continent, and Europe itself is just a place for brown people to become rapefugees and a place where Americans and Chinese go to take pictures of old buildings and fantasies what life must have been like in the past.

>>507512734
No. I support this.