Search Results
8/5/2025, 6:50:14 PM
>>534062807
BF3 was better in every single regard than BF4. People love parroting the dumb opinion of "4 is a technically better game" but they never specify what "technically" actually means.
4 had worse maps, a horrific launch, ruined Rush, netcode which to this day is still horrendous, unbalanced as fuck/cheap weapons (AEK, mortar), stupid levolution (cringe) and need I say it again, worse maps.
Maps are what makes a game. Without good maps, the game is ass. There is not a single good map in BF4. Play on Flood Zone and then compare it to grand bazaar and tell me that the mapmakers weren't on crack.
I know I'm seething. I think the vast majority of people who say BF4 is better just literally didn't experience 3 in it's heyday. 3 was and IS better by every metric I can think of.
>>534064835 tells the truth. BF4 was nothing more than a rushed project to turn a profit. It didn't have any love put into it, unlike BF3.
BF3 was better in every single regard than BF4. People love parroting the dumb opinion of "4 is a technically better game" but they never specify what "technically" actually means.
4 had worse maps, a horrific launch, ruined Rush, netcode which to this day is still horrendous, unbalanced as fuck/cheap weapons (AEK, mortar), stupid levolution (cringe) and need I say it again, worse maps.
Maps are what makes a game. Without good maps, the game is ass. There is not a single good map in BF4. Play on Flood Zone and then compare it to grand bazaar and tell me that the mapmakers weren't on crack.
I know I'm seething. I think the vast majority of people who say BF4 is better just literally didn't experience 3 in it's heyday. 3 was and IS better by every metric I can think of.
>>534064835 tells the truth. BF4 was nothing more than a rushed project to turn a profit. It didn't have any love put into it, unlike BF3.
Page 1