>>510535154
Is it really a "No True Scotsman" to account for the historical relevance of the schism and the protestant reformation? These were both major deviations away from the foundational principles and history of Christianity. To claim a modern day protestant is in the same camp as a Christian from the 1400s is pretty absurd, let alone the 400s before the schism. With just a bit of historical context the problems of modern Christianity become problems caused by the Roman Catholic handling of the protestant reformation and the subsequent descent into abject madness relative to the stability of the earlier church after it's adoption phase.