Search Results
7/5/2025, 4:36:26 PM
>>714583823
>>714583973
>>714583984
>>714582987
You are right anons, I'm the one who is stupid, I googled "pirate software age" and assumed that the fucking first result SAYING PIRATE SOFTWARE AND LISTING A FUCKING BIRTHDAY was fucking pirate software, and not his fucking god damn lead artist.
1987 is the correct birth year, making him about 16 when 4chan was founded in 2003, and 18 when it got popular in 2005. maaaaaybe he was here at 17, "growing up" here is a bit of a stretch, tho. maybe "impressional years" is acceptable?
and of course he would have been 19 when live-leak went live.
So yeah, that's all bull. Gun to my head if I HAD to defend the dude (and he really doesn't deserve it at this point) I would say: "Well, both of those were almost half his life ago, so he might remember them as from a more influentual age which his brain translates to younger than he actually way" because it's such a weird thing and easily checkable lie to make up.
>>714583973
>>714583984
>>714582987
You are right anons, I'm the one who is stupid, I googled "pirate software age" and assumed that the fucking first result SAYING PIRATE SOFTWARE AND LISTING A FUCKING BIRTHDAY was fucking pirate software, and not his fucking god damn lead artist.
1987 is the correct birth year, making him about 16 when 4chan was founded in 2003, and 18 when it got popular in 2005. maaaaaybe he was here at 17, "growing up" here is a bit of a stretch, tho. maybe "impressional years" is acceptable?
and of course he would have been 19 when live-leak went live.
So yeah, that's all bull. Gun to my head if I HAD to defend the dude (and he really doesn't deserve it at this point) I would say: "Well, both of those were almost half his life ago, so he might remember them as from a more influentual age which his brain translates to younger than he actually way" because it's such a weird thing and easily checkable lie to make up.
Page 1