>>509944652
Again, your ignorance is no excuse. You're gonna eventually have to realize that decisions are massive in scope. It's why I'm grilling you repeatedly on the redefinition of jurisdiction. If you're unaware that the relevant passages in Plyler and WKA aren't written in big, bold letters but still carry immense weight... well, first, you should be embarrassed because you don't have the slightest clue how the Court works. Second, you should try to understand that sometimes (often, really) the Court uses the ostensible issue at hand as a vehicle to address other issues. Look at the recent ruling against nationwide injunctions. They threw that back to the lower courts with silence on the Constitutional issue (and even double-underlined it with an update) but a very clear direction that nationwide injunctions are no longer copacetic.

You're unfortunately one of those blissful ignorants who've convinced themselves that 14A was literally ever on the table. It was never about that. The sad part is that you're not reachable. You are so irrationally attached to your crackpot legal theory that even if you're the last one on the train, you're gonna stay on until you literally die.

But hey, trust the plan, or whatever kek

>>509844248

Sign tappers are the Qtards who didn't get off the ride in time, and have devolved into a new form of schizo posting.