Search Results
6/29/2025, 10:35:05 PM
>>40222428
>>40222661
I don't get that NYT article you're citing. By the time it was published, the study mentioned had already published "Psychosocial Functioning in Transgender Youth after 2 Years of Hormones", "Laboratory Changes During Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy in Transgender Adolescents", and 10 other papers; this January they published "Emotional Health of Transgender Youth 24 Months After Initiating Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy". The article also immediately mentions that she intends to publish the data and that this was being delayed by a then-recent funding cut. I agree with the POV CNN mentions in its opening: that such is just "the normal caution being taken by researchers to carefully present and interpret scientific data".
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/25/health/puberty-blocking-medications-transgender-kids
In other words, the New York Times brazenly lied, as you are right now.
Here's a question: why has the New York Times NEVER, EVER, mentioned that this review: >>40222581 exists?
AT ALL?
They have NEVER reported that the Utah Review exists.
GLAAD knows why:
https://glaad.org/nyt-podcast-trans-healthcare/
>When there is news of legitimate research and reports that support medically necessary, mainstream care, and detail the benefits of it, the Times has failed to cover it. The Times has covered Utah’s legislative attacks against the transgender community in more than half a dozen stories, but did not cover the Utah legislature’s study finding that transgender health care benefits trans youth.
It's because they are a biased source. You're citing a refuted, biased source with a history of homophobia because you don't like what the real facts are. You refuse to acknowledge the Utah Review because it does not fit your anti-trans narrative. It's over, you lost the debate. Trans medicine is evidence-based as recognized by dozens of countries.
>>40222661
I don't get that NYT article you're citing. By the time it was published, the study mentioned had already published "Psychosocial Functioning in Transgender Youth after 2 Years of Hormones", "Laboratory Changes During Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy in Transgender Adolescents", and 10 other papers; this January they published "Emotional Health of Transgender Youth 24 Months After Initiating Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy". The article also immediately mentions that she intends to publish the data and that this was being delayed by a then-recent funding cut. I agree with the POV CNN mentions in its opening: that such is just "the normal caution being taken by researchers to carefully present and interpret scientific data".
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/25/health/puberty-blocking-medications-transgender-kids
In other words, the New York Times brazenly lied, as you are right now.
Here's a question: why has the New York Times NEVER, EVER, mentioned that this review: >>40222581 exists?
AT ALL?
They have NEVER reported that the Utah Review exists.
GLAAD knows why:
https://glaad.org/nyt-podcast-trans-healthcare/
>When there is news of legitimate research and reports that support medically necessary, mainstream care, and detail the benefits of it, the Times has failed to cover it. The Times has covered Utah’s legislative attacks against the transgender community in more than half a dozen stories, but did not cover the Utah legislature’s study finding that transgender health care benefits trans youth.
It's because they are a biased source. You're citing a refuted, biased source with a history of homophobia because you don't like what the real facts are. You refuse to acknowledge the Utah Review because it does not fit your anti-trans narrative. It's over, you lost the debate. Trans medicine is evidence-based as recognized by dozens of countries.
Page 1