>>22886546
>He's referring to
Current day with all your smartphone espionage capability and your spy satellites, your CIA has admitted they have 0 intel on North Korea.

But I'm supposed to believe Mao killed sparrows back when China was more closed off than North Korea, and you had even less espionage capabilities?
I don't trust your mainstream media.
This also means I don't trust the things in the past claimed by your mainstream media.

Here's another one for you:
https://files.catbox.moe/rpzgus.webm (embed)
I'm somehow^^^ s supposed to believe the people on the left side of the video are the good guys?
And the other side are the bad guys?

Do you understand why your narrative if falling apart at the seams?

>>22886546
>He's referring to
Current day with all your maarphon spionag capabiliti an your py sattlites, your CIA has amitted they have 0 intel on North Korea.

But I'm supposed to believe Mao killed sparrows back when China was more closed off than North Korea, an you had even less espionage capabilities?

I don't trust your mainstream media.
This also means I don't trust the thing in the past claimed by your mainstream media.

Here's another one for you:
https://files.catbox.moe/rpzgus.webm
I'm somehow^^^ s supposed to believe the people on the left side of the video are the good guys?
And the other side are the bad guys?

Do you understand why your narrative if falling apart at the seams?