>>95825922
>freeform is NOT subjective it means absence of rules
Jesus jumping christ how many times do you eyes glaze over "freeform does not mean an absence of rules" before it actually sticks in that sponge you call a brain? News flash, it's not an either-or situation where it's rules-lite or no rules at all. Most freeform games I've seen have a ruleset, but ones that has little focus on crunchy mathematics for mechanics, aka no shit like classes, levels, exp, stats, or whatever. They'll more often focus on how to handle disagreements between players or the game master, obvious rule patches like sticking to the abilities that or skills on your character sheet, or telling people to not act like shitheads to each other OOC.

>Freeform roleplay doesn't have rules
Play one sometime instead of just hammering it in that you've zero understanding of what you're even saying, you actual degenerate