Search Results
7/20/2025, 7:53:43 AM
>>18490906
>>18490937
Here’s my autism rant on the 1101 vs the 0105:
Pic related is the 1101 sized up to a 35. I could do a size 34 for a better fitting waist, but the 1101’s top block is pretty slim for a 1947 inspired cut, so i preferred sizing up for extra leg width to accommodate my slightly larger thighs. Compared to my 0105s in size 33, I prefer how these look. However, there is a slight restriction of mobility in the crotch area. In order for me to elevate my legs without tension in the crotch, I need to pull up the legs of the jeans or pull the waist up to my hips, which is counter to how jeans will naturally rest slouch below my hips. It’s not a crazy amount of restriction, but it’s noticeably more than the 0105. Even though I prefer how the 1101 looks relative to the 0105, 90% I will reach for the 0105s because of how incredibly comfortable and functional they are. Pure unrestricted mobility. This may not be a big dealbreaker for you, but I personally place a huge factor of importance on how mobile a pair of jeans are in the crotch area. If I can’t easily elevate my legs, it drives me nuts.
Fullcount’s philosophy is comfort. The 0105 is based on a pair of 1953 repros, but they intentionally made the cut more wide to provide maximum comfort and mobility This isn’t to say the 1101 isn’t comfortable, you just need to know that it won’t be nearly as comfortable as the 0105, especially if you have athletic thighs like myself. If you’re a slim dude, you should have zero issue with the 1101. I think the ultimate reason to buy a pair of Fullcounts is for comfort. The relatively loose weave denim with Zimbabwean cotton paired with a wide cut is what does that. This is why I reach for my 0105s way more than my 1101, because they are fundamental recipe of Fullcount’s philosophy. I never even really liked how the cut looked, but because they feel incredible, I look past their appearance and instead just enjoy wearing the jeans themselves.
>>18490937
Here’s my autism rant on the 1101 vs the 0105:
Pic related is the 1101 sized up to a 35. I could do a size 34 for a better fitting waist, but the 1101’s top block is pretty slim for a 1947 inspired cut, so i preferred sizing up for extra leg width to accommodate my slightly larger thighs. Compared to my 0105s in size 33, I prefer how these look. However, there is a slight restriction of mobility in the crotch area. In order for me to elevate my legs without tension in the crotch, I need to pull up the legs of the jeans or pull the waist up to my hips, which is counter to how jeans will naturally rest slouch below my hips. It’s not a crazy amount of restriction, but it’s noticeably more than the 0105. Even though I prefer how the 1101 looks relative to the 0105, 90% I will reach for the 0105s because of how incredibly comfortable and functional they are. Pure unrestricted mobility. This may not be a big dealbreaker for you, but I personally place a huge factor of importance on how mobile a pair of jeans are in the crotch area. If I can’t easily elevate my legs, it drives me nuts.
Fullcount’s philosophy is comfort. The 0105 is based on a pair of 1953 repros, but they intentionally made the cut more wide to provide maximum comfort and mobility This isn’t to say the 1101 isn’t comfortable, you just need to know that it won’t be nearly as comfortable as the 0105, especially if you have athletic thighs like myself. If you’re a slim dude, you should have zero issue with the 1101. I think the ultimate reason to buy a pair of Fullcounts is for comfort. The relatively loose weave denim with Zimbabwean cotton paired with a wide cut is what does that. This is why I reach for my 0105s way more than my 1101, because they are fundamental recipe of Fullcount’s philosophy. I never even really liked how the cut looked, but because they feel incredible, I look past their appearance and instead just enjoy wearing the jeans themselves.
Page 1