>DRONES WILL TAKE OVER IN WAR AND THE WEST DIDNT SUSPECT A THING
EW can easily neutralize all that aren't fiber optically guided.
>YEAH OKAY SO WE'LL MAKE THEM FIBER OPTIC GUIDED, INCREASE THEIR RANGE AND PUT TANDEM WARHEADS IN THEM
Like those loitering munitions that have been getting shown off at every arms expo for decades now and everyone relevant already knows about?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spike_(missile)
>B-BUT MUH POINT-TRACKING ALGORITHM
Lock-on after launch (fire and forget) has been a feature of pic related since ages ago
>B-BUT MUH AI THAT WILL TOTALLY MAKE IT AN UNSTOPPABLE KILLING MACHINE
in 2 more weeks?

Drones are great at certain things but anyone who thinks they'll revolutionize warfare is retarded. The main reason people over-estimate them is because they're great at increasing lethality in retard-fights and allow for easy filming/uploading of clips for propaganda.
It's kind of like TOW missiles when they hit Syria. Suddenly the chimps who were firing AKs over their heads hoping Allah would guide their bullets had a weapon which with minimal training would just fly towards where they pointed it and then explode. And so for a couple years there was video after video uploaded of groups of infantry blown to pieces by ATGMs. Had that been today these same retards would be talking about how ATGMs have revolutionized warfare and that warfare will never be the same again, there's nothing you can do against ATGMs, that the age of infantry is over etc.
But actual 1st world militaries can in reality deal with them and train against them.
Ever wonder why we aren't seeing a bunch of Israelis getting blown up with drones?

>>507398794
how did they even smuggle this stuff in