>>28438478
>more cargo space than a crossover
Barely. It's 5" longer than a Traverse and half of it is hood.
>better seating position than a crossover
Literally exactly the same as a Traverse.
>better on crappy roads than a crossover
What metric is used to measure this?
>better handling than a crossover
Does the extra half ton of weight with a higher center of gravity make it handle better?
>worse mpg than a crossover, but you're not a faggot that would prefer a trannyverse 4 banger over a longitudinally mounted V8, right?
Literally the only thing it's good for but hardly worth $20k for just a 5.3L that only makes 30hp more than a turbo 4 banger