>Yesterday you ran away with your short tail between your legs.
Not the same anon though.
>no, it's literally the bare minimum
How is being able to launch one of the most powerful BVRAAM in the world is a bare minimum? BVR capability is all about modern air combat. Dogfight is a relic of a bygone era as proved in indian-paki war.
>not the version you're currently building.
? You can literally drop kggb from F-4 or F-5 because it uses a separate PDA from the computer used in jets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-DFYKeucR4
>So why would anyone want to buy the block 1? It just goes to prove they've been bought by worst korea to throw them a lifeline.
>let's just ignore both F-16 and Rafale has a huge backlog while KF-21 has a superior RCS due to it's S-duct design
It's not an F-35 replacement that you think of but it clearly isn't a slop that you think of.
>Meanwhile even your own partner, Indonesia is rethinking their financial involvement
Indonesia was caught trying to steal its technology, so it's de facto out of the contributor status. Buy anyways it resumed paying for the program again after a few negotiations.
https://biz.chosun.com/en/en-industry/2025/07/04/KVKX2CEIIFDKTN2DFFEG5XSWGY/
>>64012591
>Yes, which means it'll actually enter service between 2029-2033.
Why would you take that long for a mere software update?