Search Results
6/19/2025, 11:46:25 PM
>>17777041
>This is a conspiracy theory I haven't heard before
It's still *true* whether you want to call me a conspiracist or not. The Talmud wasn't written until long after the events of the first century, and it was originally composed by people who borrowed from both Gnostic and Zoroastrian mysticism. Modern Judaism is entirely about the Talmud and has nothing to do with believing or following any part of the Bible, despite what they would have you believe.
To this cult, the Babylonian Talmud overrules everything.
Furthermore, all you have to do to see the gnostic connection is take note of the similarities in the dualist cosmologies. Not only do they share deity names with gnostic literature, both belief systems also teach that good and evil are equal and opposing forces, which is dualist cosmology. This is entirely against what the Bible teaches. There are many examples of this and it can't really be argued against, without sinking to intellectual dishonesty about the subject, which is what many do. See pic as one example.
>>17777047
>They share our genetic markers,
The Palestinians are really going to be the closest genetically to the ancient Judeans.
The fallacy here is that you keep going back and forth between genetic and ideological definitions of what you think Jews are. In objective standards, modern people who claim to be Jews have no connection to the ancient Jews mentioned in the Bible. They share as much genetic similarity to ancient Jews as any random person you would find Lithuania or Poland.
You can argue modern groups that call themselves Jews have similarities between them, but that's because they were based on the same gnostic cult originally. They've simply developed or grown into different factions. One large faction is based on Eastern European pagans who were converted in the middle ages for example. They still have nothing to do with Biblical or ancient Jews. I don't care how much you have emotionally invested in thinking they do.
>This is a conspiracy theory I haven't heard before
It's still *true* whether you want to call me a conspiracist or not. The Talmud wasn't written until long after the events of the first century, and it was originally composed by people who borrowed from both Gnostic and Zoroastrian mysticism. Modern Judaism is entirely about the Talmud and has nothing to do with believing or following any part of the Bible, despite what they would have you believe.
To this cult, the Babylonian Talmud overrules everything.
Furthermore, all you have to do to see the gnostic connection is take note of the similarities in the dualist cosmologies. Not only do they share deity names with gnostic literature, both belief systems also teach that good and evil are equal and opposing forces, which is dualist cosmology. This is entirely against what the Bible teaches. There are many examples of this and it can't really be argued against, without sinking to intellectual dishonesty about the subject, which is what many do. See pic as one example.
>>17777047
>They share our genetic markers,
The Palestinians are really going to be the closest genetically to the ancient Judeans.
The fallacy here is that you keep going back and forth between genetic and ideological definitions of what you think Jews are. In objective standards, modern people who claim to be Jews have no connection to the ancient Jews mentioned in the Bible. They share as much genetic similarity to ancient Jews as any random person you would find Lithuania or Poland.
You can argue modern groups that call themselves Jews have similarities between them, but that's because they were based on the same gnostic cult originally. They've simply developed or grown into different factions. One large faction is based on Eastern European pagans who were converted in the middle ages for example. They still have nothing to do with Biblical or ancient Jews. I don't care how much you have emotionally invested in thinking they do.
Page 1