Search Results
7/26/2025, 10:55:55 PM
>>96183876
>the funniest part about those cards is how they have fat/soft faces with glasses. it's the absolute archetype of undesirable male - weak and crippled. So absolute ugly, that not even men with a soft spot for ugly characters like them.
True, and yet another evidence the "muh representation, we want to see ourselves displayed on the card" was complete bullshit or total misunderstanding from JotC from the start of the DEI corpo agenda.
I NEVER wanted to look at frail, ugly nip males with glasses on my cards, i never wanted to associate with them nor even be remembered they exist. I wouldn't want to see me on a card neither. And ofc i clearly don't want to see obese nigresses on wheelchair on my fantasy cards.
If something human-like featured on a card is less than 9/10; then it can only be on a black card to depict a removal : screaming and suffering for being UGLY.
>the funniest part about those cards is how they have fat/soft faces with glasses. it's the absolute archetype of undesirable male - weak and crippled. So absolute ugly, that not even men with a soft spot for ugly characters like them.
True, and yet another evidence the "muh representation, we want to see ourselves displayed on the card" was complete bullshit or total misunderstanding from JotC from the start of the DEI corpo agenda.
I NEVER wanted to look at frail, ugly nip males with glasses on my cards, i never wanted to associate with them nor even be remembered they exist. I wouldn't want to see me on a card neither. And ofc i clearly don't want to see obese nigresses on wheelchair on my fantasy cards.
If something human-like featured on a card is less than 9/10; then it can only be on a black card to depict a removal : screaming and suffering for being UGLY.
Page 1