>>105646192
here you go, but im on cfg 1 so i think this is just the equivalent of a WAN gen with an empty prompt
proof: https://files.catbox.moe/5uljpo.mp4

>>105646199
yeah I have absolutely no complaints for t2v. I'm still firmly in the honeymoon phase and having a lot of fun

>>105646239
no idea, but people recommend the lora for the added versatility. no real reason to use the merge anymore if you're setting up a fresh workflow from what i've heard