>>149312268
>You gonna cry because someone reenacts 9/11 with Spongebob characters?
No, because none of that portrays some individual undergoing some horrific part of that in a sexually gratifying way. Call it arbitrary, but the line we set is always going to be "arbitrary" in some way. What's the point of adding it if not to take some kind of pleasure in adding some aspect of a child torture murder? I swear, there wouldn't be as much pushback here in even criticizing this if this was just some openly liberal noname Twitter fag.