>>96239908
>>96240951

>we don't need to spin off more doomed generals.
And how has this message been received when flesh and blood enjoyers posted it?

>fabgot
>weak game can't even support its own general
>there's only two of you, your left and right hand
>they're pathetic because they don't have so many visitors discussing the game they blot out the thread
>will be dead in two weeks

Time to pick a lane. Either you gatekeep so hard you drive all 'new' games away or you finally give up the ghost and stop harassing people who discuss their alternative card games here. If the above guy truly wishes to speak for all of us then there is no card war. Just play and enjoy whatever you like, but defend that ideal. Be supportive of other game visitors from time to time, not defecate on them when their jersey doesn't match the one the most of you are wearing at the time. We need to become more of a league of card games, not a secluded monastery where only the 'enlightened' dwell. The rules are clear, post about card games that aren't the big three contenders; because it is those who would gladly congregate in their own threads.

Know this and know it well; our diversity is our strength.