Search Results
7/25/2025, 11:09:15 PM
Most chuds are authoritian, it's just the truth. Leftist authoritianism is also real, but when it's full on authoritianism then it still is socially conservative, Khmer Rouge, Soviet Union, China. Modern Russia is arguably leftist (/pol/ will try to convince you otherwise completely ignoring Putin's crusade against any nationalism and worship of Muslims, particularly Chechens). If you go on /pol/ you can clearly see the actual opinions of conservative people on freedom of speech and artistic freedom and such.
Liberal censorship is also real, but it's limp by defualt and can be countered. People saying liberal censorship is literally North Korea are delusional firsties who don't know what shitty life of censorship and persecution actually looks like. The worst kind of liberal censorship is mostly situated in Europe with their bureaucrats jerking off to censoring "problematic" shit on the net and interest in mass surveillance. US liberalism is banning or demonetizing (You) on some liberal leaning social media site or whatever. Ffs, I don't think even the currrent liberal echo chamber analogue to Xitter with BlueSky will ban you for being a chud, people just try not to engage with these kind of accounts on there so they don't come there cause the bait doesn't work.
The current censorship boogeyman is a supposed femenist organization, but you look at them and they're basically socially conservative on every other thing. Now I don't follow the conspiracy of them being a front for some chud organization, what I am saying that those are not really "femenists" in the same way as mainstream femenists are and they basically are not aligned with almost any position that is considered in the "mainstream discourse" to be leftist, even if you can argue that on soe fundamental level they still are leftists.
Liberal censorship is also real, but it's limp by defualt and can be countered. People saying liberal censorship is literally North Korea are delusional firsties who don't know what shitty life of censorship and persecution actually looks like. The worst kind of liberal censorship is mostly situated in Europe with their bureaucrats jerking off to censoring "problematic" shit on the net and interest in mass surveillance. US liberalism is banning or demonetizing (You) on some liberal leaning social media site or whatever. Ffs, I don't think even the currrent liberal echo chamber analogue to Xitter with BlueSky will ban you for being a chud, people just try not to engage with these kind of accounts on there so they don't come there cause the bait doesn't work.
The current censorship boogeyman is a supposed femenist organization, but you look at them and they're basically socially conservative on every other thing. Now I don't follow the conspiracy of them being a front for some chud organization, what I am saying that those are not really "femenists" in the same way as mainstream femenists are and they basically are not aligned with almost any position that is considered in the "mainstream discourse" to be leftist, even if you can argue that on soe fundamental level they still are leftists.
7/18/2025, 5:27:22 PM
>>212896784
Lady and gentlemeds, I think we may have found our Med Boy Summer champion.
Lady and gentlemeds, I think we may have found our Med Boy Summer champion.
6/27/2025, 5:17:27 PM
>>212168322
The Japanese are going to eat them alive once Breizhotwink and his coworkers unionise.
>>212171304
But they aren't Poles, nor are they being forced to leave.
The Japanese are going to eat them alive once Breizhotwink and his coworkers unionise.
>>212171304
But they aren't Poles, nor are they being forced to leave.
Page 1