Search Results
7/24/2025, 2:59:19 PM
>>106008754
>>everyone associates him with this crazy pedo
Stallman?
>>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>>
>>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>>
>>--------------------------
>>
>>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>>
>>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>>
>>--------------------------
>>
>>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>>
>>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>>
>>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia
>>everyone associates him with this crazy pedo
Stallman?
>>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>>
>>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>>
>>--------------------------
>>
>>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>>
>>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>>
>>--------------------------
>>
>>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>>
>>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>>
>>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia
7/10/2025, 2:18:12 AM
>>212600110
Mas não existe Paraná no mapa mundi
Mas não existe Paraná no mapa mundi
7/8/2025, 7:27:10 AM
>>105834639
>It's almost like there's an infiltration of unstable b-cluster h
RMS was pro-loli before you were born.
The fact is the only people who have the time to program (at all) are people without fat wives.
White people (who by definition bar anyone who likes cute young girls) do not program because they have no time to do so: since they are slaves of "their" women: who make them look after the kids (which is womans work) in addition to whatever job they have to feed the fat hog of a "WUHHHMAN" (aka a white).
>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>
>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>
>
>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>
>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>
>
>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>
>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>
>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia
>It's almost like there's an infiltration of unstable b-cluster h
RMS was pro-loli before you were born.
The fact is the only people who have the time to program (at all) are people without fat wives.
White people (who by definition bar anyone who likes cute young girls) do not program because they have no time to do so: since they are slaves of "their" women: who make them look after the kids (which is womans work) in addition to whatever job they have to feed the fat hog of a "WUHHHMAN" (aka a white).
>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>
>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>
>
>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>
>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>
>
>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>
>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>
>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia
6/26/2025, 8:34:38 AM
>>508763859
Christians oppose child brides
"better a millstone"
>BUT IT DOESN"T MEAN THAT
It does now.
The New Testament didn't exist to the medeval knight. It only existed to the medevial pesant, if at all.
Knights were taught the old testament or authurian legend. Not the castrate thyself newtestament.
New Testament is basically a 1:1 with pro-women's rights, anti-pedo, anti-male, belief.
Strange...
Is it really as old as we, who have been able to read for only 200 years, are told?
Christians oppose child brides
"better a millstone"
>BUT IT DOESN"T MEAN THAT
It does now.
The New Testament didn't exist to the medeval knight. It only existed to the medevial pesant, if at all.
Knights were taught the old testament or authurian legend. Not the castrate thyself newtestament.
New Testament is basically a 1:1 with pro-women's rights, anti-pedo, anti-male, belief.
Strange...
Is it really as old as we, who have been able to read for only 200 years, are told?
6/18/2025, 11:25:43 PM
>>507899813
Men used to beat the shit out of women.
Before whites existed.
White is a completely different standard of existance:
1) No child brides
2) No multiple brides
3) Woman is "wife" now: before she was just woman or girl (go read the old languages if you don't believe me)
4) Man is "husband" now, which means caretaker: before he was "master" "lord' (again, go read the old languages if you don't believe me (ex: in the old testament he's called ba'al: lord, master. adoni: lord, etc (shutup zoomer fag, I know you'll contest this because you don't know shit))
5) No Beating of women
6) No Executing of women who fucked around
7) No Executing of women who dissed their master (in england they threw them out of windows: judge allowed it at bar)
Men used to beat the shit out of women.
Before whites existed.
White is a completely different standard of existance:
1) No child brides
2) No multiple brides
3) Woman is "wife" now: before she was just woman or girl (go read the old languages if you don't believe me)
4) Man is "husband" now, which means caretaker: before he was "master" "lord' (again, go read the old languages if you don't believe me (ex: in the old testament he's called ba'al: lord, master. adoni: lord, etc (shutup zoomer fag, I know you'll contest this because you don't know shit))
5) No Beating of women
6) No Executing of women who fucked around
7) No Executing of women who dissed their master (in england they threw them out of windows: judge allowed it at bar)
6/16/2025, 7:47:44 PM
𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊 why does look like the english idogram: "YHWH" "yhwh"?
Is Torah cesar cyphered:LMLK/KLML (𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊) --> YHWH ?
Is Torah cesar cyphered:LMLK/KLML (𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊) --> YHWH ?
Page 1