𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊 why does look like YHWH? - /x/ (#40543167) [Archived: 967 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/16/2025, 7:43:08 PM No.40543167
Screenshot 2024-06-04 at 18-49-24 vermilio helck - Google Search
Why does the phoenecan look like "YHWH" (yhwh) (YhWh)?
Replies: >>40543287
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 7:45:06 PM No.40543177
𐤌𐤋𐤊 "king"

𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊 "of the king"
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 7:46:14 PM No.40543182
jhgfdghjhgfdghjyfrds
jhgfdghjhgfdghjyfrds
md5: f2d550dc05f5a2029b57d108c74c42aa🔍
𐤌𐤋𐤊 "king"

𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊 "of the king"
YHWH

In the old manuscripts the square script wasn't used for YHWH's name, but instead the older script ("paleo hebrew") was used, which was repourpoused phonecan.

This was found in even the manuscripts near Jesus/RomanEmpire time in the cave a cummran.

Everything else was in square script, only YHWH's name was in paleo-hebrew (which was phonecan)

Which makes one wonder if the actual ideogram was 𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 7:47:44 PM No.40543186
1640348301352
1640348301352
md5: 0cea0d2ad1c4448882bcd05257636966🔍
𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊 why does look like the english idogram: "YHWH" "yhwh"?
Is Torah cesar cyphered:LMLK/KLML (𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊) --> YHWH ?
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 7:53:32 PM No.40543218
uytrertytrertew
uytrertytrertew
md5: 6122e5a96d6198077a67512ab4168033🔍
The hebrew today, which is all square script, uses different hebrew letters for YHWH ( יהוה ) but in the past the paleo-hebrew was used instead (which would have been (through anacronism) : " 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 " : though we don't get to see the cummran cave manuscripts for some reason)

But is it not interesting that the english ideogram: "yhwh" and the phonecan "𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊" look the same?
While we are told "𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊" means KLML / LMLK
(camel, Linux Mailing List Kernel)
The fact is that before the finding of the manuscripts in the cummran natural arcades: in english the name of god was thought to be "Jehova"
After the cummran cave findings:
YHWH was popularized from the 1960s on, in english.

Is it not strange that "𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊" looks so much mike YhWh?
And taken the info we've been given.
1) No you can't look at the manuscripts
2) Yes the name of the god was written in paleo-hebrew and not square script in these manuscripts
3) We know paleo-hebrew was "just" phonecan.

Maybe they saw "𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊" and transliterated it as yhwh?
For public consumption.
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 7:54:43 PM No.40543227
kjhgfghjhgfghf
kjhgfghjhgfghf
md5: 72b8e9fa803ecd9882fd35511a9acbc9🔍
>>507611430
>The spread and evolution of written language sure is interesting.

In the west it's all greek.
(Linear A and Linear B).

Hebrew is from greek,
Latin is from greek.
Coptic script is from greek. (coptics used to cut the dick and balls off boys to make eunich slaves up till 1850 or so when the brits stopped them: that's why christians were hated in the muslim world btw) (same reason muslims were hated in the christian world)

They actual words are vastly different.
But the alphabet is all greek.

The egyptians had a competing system:
but it died out.

I think it's a strange coincidence that the word christian 4chan /pol/ posters post now as the name of "moloch": "𐤌𐤋𐤊" is visually so close to the english ideogram used now for the old testament god, post cummran cave findings (YHWH): "𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊"

Yes I "know" this transliterates differently into square-script hebrew, but how do we "know" a mistake wasn't made by the researchers, or maybe they just saw the name of the god, in a different script, and jotted it down as yhwh? And that stuck since the 1960s?
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 8:05:54 PM No.40543282
cirno80srd
cirno80srd
md5: 7d7a04baba09f51603bcde140486f53f🔍
White people here, who hate YHWH, because "pedos", and love Jesus: who drowns pedos with millstones, constantly post

"Use the name of their real god: 𐤌𐤋𐤊 ."
As an "I win" statement.

What they, the white people, mean by " 𐤌𐤋𐤊 " is "moloch": and by posting that imply that people who like the old testament (which the white people call "the talmud" "stop quoting the talmud" when I quote the first five books of the old testament (and yes they keep saying "stop quoting the talmud, months, years later: so whites have decided that the first 5 books of the old testament are "the illegitimate talmud" here on 4chan)) worship moloch, and not god.

So I found it interesthing that said script looks familiar.
𐤌𐤋𐤊 is ancient phonecan and means "king"
looks like a y, lowercase h, and a w
𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊 is ancient phonecan that means "of the king"

YHWH.

Strange coincidence that it looks so similar
>(NOOO those "lowercase H's are Ls!)
They look like lowercase h's
How would a researcher in a cave jot them down?
Looks like yhwh if one were to transliterate into english directly from the text
(which would have been in paleo-hebrew/ancient phonecan for the name of the god, though the rest of the lettering was in square script)

Maybe the /pol/ faggot white fucks were right but stopped their research?
Marry little girls.

Even if YHWH is "moloch" (king).
Marry little girls.
Still worship YHWH.
He's pro marry little girls
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 8:06:45 PM No.40543287
>>40543167 (OP)
Mlk is molech
Replies: >>40543298
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 8:07:13 PM No.40543288
1661619641546498
1661619641546498
md5: c3c8ea889b80a6a7b0964a8f19558aae🔍
YHWH allows child brides
<--------------------
White people don't like this.

White people like their new new testament god Jesus and his millstones, and abrogation of YHWH"s law. No stone woman!
Anonymous
6/16/2025, 8:08:53 PM No.40543298
>>40543287
Yes, I know.
However, "to the king", which was written on pots in ancient israel, in ancient phonecan script (paleo hebrew), on collection jars for taxes to the king.

Looks supiciously like "YHWH".
Also the name of the god was written in the phonecan script and not the square script in the cumran texts.