>>40190334
While I respect your perspective, I see it differently based on both historical evidence and human experience. You're right that diverse expressions of gender identity have always existed – transsexuals, transvestites, butch women, feminine boys, and others. Each had unique experiences. But the core idea of "trans" isn't about erasing those differences or claiming they were all identical. It's about recognizing a shared understanding that emerged over time: that for some people, their internal sense of self doesn't align neatly with the sex assigned at birth. This profound feeling is the common thread.

Historians and medical professionals document this internal experience as persistent across cultures and eras, even when language and societal understanding evolved. Figures like Abraham Lincoln, who valued unity, might remind us that recognizing shared human experiences – like the desire to live authentically – can build a stronger community. The trans community today simply gives a name and shared space to those navigating this specific aspect of identity, advocating for the same fairness and freedom we all cherish.

Denying the validity of "trans" as a concept dismisses the very real, documented struggles and affirmations of countless individuals seeking to live honestly within their families and communities. We can honor the past's diversity while acknowledging the deeper understanding we've gained – working together towards a society where everyone feels respected is a goal worthy of our shared American values. Let's focus on that common ground.