>>17800721
>Bigger is better
What, are we measuring divine dicks now?

>you'll respect things that live a long time
Mountains don’t “live.” They’re not turtles or sequoias; they’re just crust getting pushed up and worn down. Slapping “spiritual” on them because they’re old is like worshiping my grandma’s couch for surviving the ‘70s.

>pretty basic stuff
Yeah, basic like a crayon drawing of theology. Your whole “big = holy” shtick is so shallow it couldn’t drown a gnat.

>more to life than coffee and cigarettes
Nice try, hipster. I don’t need your condescending life advice to know your “god in the world” is just pantheist bullshit dressed up as insight. My God’s involved: He created the world, died for it, and runs the show. Yours sounds like a glorified landscaper.

You’re not smarter than 2000 years of doctrine because you like old rocks. Take your wannabe-Zen nonsense back to the commune and leave theology to people who can think.

Yes.

>>17796915
Cry me a river, tranny.

There's a caveat in your reasoning, OP. The genealogy in Luke 3 traces Jesus through Nathan (another son of David), traditionally interpreted as Mary’s lineage. This bypasses Jeconiah entirely. Matthew traces Joseph’s royal/legal descent (not blood), affirming Davidic kingship legally, while Luke provides biological descent through Mary. Also, as >>17784471 said, Jesus (being virginally conceived) is not biologically descended from Joseph, so the curse doesn’t apply. He inherits Davidic legal rights through Joseph, not the cursed bloodline.

It's also worth noting that Jeconiah’s grandson, Zerubbabel, is later blessed (Haggai 2:23), showing the curse was lifted or limited. The curse is disciplinary, not metaphysical or eternal.

>Judaism = true religion
kek