>>715744439
>What if someone WANTS to use such products, huh?
Use them for what? Please be specific. What commercial use can you get from irradiated water outside of a painful suicide or homicide?
>Some people want to paint their house with lead, some don’t.
Well those who want to paint their house with lead will, eventually, fucking die. Should they be accountable for their uninformed decision? CAN they be held accountable when the company denies all wrongdoing and they do not fully inform customers that they literally paint their house with poison?
What benefits does toxic paint give for CUSTOMERS? Again, please feel free to be as specific as you want.
>Yesterday they banned lead paint, and tomorrow they’ll ban you from eating red meat and fish, leaving only bugs on the market.
And they fucking should if it turned out that red meat -hypothetically- would kill me in a year. Human lives should take priority over everything.
The average person can't and won't know everything and companies exploit it to put literal poison into paint just to cut costs.

Here's a fun little question. What do you think about radiotherapy? Do you think the company should have been allowed to keep using a machine that KILLS people?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therac-25
Oh I'm sure the people who died from it were able to make informed decisions from, uh... uhm, oh well, they probably deserved to die anyways right?