>>11261882
>the one time she tried to claim it was unwanted she lost the court case
>>11262434
>pay a guarantor for them, someone who is basically their voice in negotiations and legal issues
>>11264544
>I want to come back to this actually.
Women are considered to be inherently duplicitous and unable to delay gratification.
This is a big part of why female debt is such a cornerstone of this society. Women are to be grateful to have men protect them from their own vices, and owe men a debt for that.
Naturally, if a woman accuses a man of rape or sexual harassment, it becomes very hard to believe her. After all, women crave sex constantly. It's necessary to have a system that protects women from assault but also dispels false accusations.
The solution to this is known as "framing". Upon filing a legal case accusing a man of the crime, the woman is immediately restrained, nude, in a public stockade. She will have to make her own case - women do not receive legal representation. She will remain "framed" until the conclusion of the case - no provision is granted for withdrawing it.
The stockade is always in a public place. If she is a virgin, it is illegal to touch her - otherwise (including if she lost her virginity to the act she filed suit against) touching her is allowed, and her reactions to the touch are valid evidence in court. Women are considered duplicitous enough to submit themselves to this, however, so this harsh treatment is considered appropriate, and she will find herself spat upon and declared a liar as she awaits her trial - including by other women.
I'm sure you can imagine the rest. The trial itself is grueling, and the opponents' lawyers may touch her and use her getting wet to prove their point. She will likely have to prove that she didn't get wet, as arousal is consent. Women are never allowed to study law, so they rarely know the details of this.
Unless she clears her name, the outcome is likely to result in her slavery.