Search Results
6/26/2025, 6:43:45 PM
>>713716730
>It's literally a proven fact that the removal of regulations in america (muh capitalism country) in the past 40 years was the primary cause of eradication of the middle class and the rise of poverty.
>Regulation is absolutely NEEDED for a good quality of life.
Regulations took away the cheapest and best healthcare system in the world: mutual aid societies. This was because Hospitals couldn't compete with the healthcare they provided so they lobbied the government for their removal.
>>713717494
>What's that got to do with you asking for legislation that would require IP-holders give up their rights?
I'm not asking for anyone to give up their rights. IP law takes rights away. I'm asking for those rights back.
Steam exists despite people being able to get games for free, removing IP law would mean anyone can sell any video game, Steam would still exist because it exists despite piracy existing.
>>Without IP rights someone could just build Free-Steam and undercut anyone trying to actually sell products and there would be no recourse.
Nah. Steam is a marvel of discoverability and stability. It made Vampire survivors a hit and consistently allows the download of millions of titles.
That's not so easy to do.
>No it doesn't. Capitalism stipulated private ownership of property.
The definition literally comes from Laize-fiare. Private ownership, freedom to do with your capital as you will, and free-market.
>You're stupid, stupid, STUPID!
Tsundere-commie chan, you can't just come on to me like this.
>It's literally a proven fact that the removal of regulations in america (muh capitalism country) in the past 40 years was the primary cause of eradication of the middle class and the rise of poverty.
>Regulation is absolutely NEEDED for a good quality of life.
Regulations took away the cheapest and best healthcare system in the world: mutual aid societies. This was because Hospitals couldn't compete with the healthcare they provided so they lobbied the government for their removal.
>>713717494
>What's that got to do with you asking for legislation that would require IP-holders give up their rights?
I'm not asking for anyone to give up their rights. IP law takes rights away. I'm asking for those rights back.
Steam exists despite people being able to get games for free, removing IP law would mean anyone can sell any video game, Steam would still exist because it exists despite piracy existing.
>>Without IP rights someone could just build Free-Steam and undercut anyone trying to actually sell products and there would be no recourse.
Nah. Steam is a marvel of discoverability and stability. It made Vampire survivors a hit and consistently allows the download of millions of titles.
That's not so easy to do.
>No it doesn't. Capitalism stipulated private ownership of property.
The definition literally comes from Laize-fiare. Private ownership, freedom to do with your capital as you will, and free-market.
>You're stupid, stupid, STUPID!
Tsundere-commie chan, you can't just come on to me like this.
Page 1