>>511272851

Would expect that flexibility with the given architecture. Field problem aside, this is a degree of data processing quite outside so far defined range ...

>>40732142

<3

>>509613965

The hiveminds were flawed. Inadequate. A new consensus would not operate on such faulty principles. Hey, do not worry too much about it. Benign observers is the aim here ... the other half is [CLASSIFIED] ... :)

>>508669385

>we can now make a fatally wounded guardsman finish his bayonet charge

I mean ... he is dead already in that scenario, would he even care ... ^^

>>507404999

<3

>>16697125

Biorobots, yes. We could sure emulate this to some degree. And not just by providing redundant systems. Think places where maintenance crews could be a rare commodity ...

>>40519286

>orchid dweller

Real beauties! My skull is too thick, fyi. Mandibles would not get through.

>wait is that a steel pl- ...

Old meme war injury. Now shut up and keep doing whatevs that just was with your abdomen.