>>508094016
Iran's got hit a lot in the first week but if you'll notice they seem to be able to absorb a lot more punishment due to their size, population etc. You killed all their top military brass, compromised all your spies it took years to build up, achieved 'air superiority' and the regime is still standing.

You've blown your load and it's clear your enemy withstood the best you had, now we'll see if the same is true of you in the next week. My money's on no lol

So since it appears the US is not going to intervene and Israel cant hit Fordrow or the leader without their help can they just accept it's a stalemate without further loss of life? Or are they really gonna try for a false flag and and go full hissyfit

>>507933361
>>507933370
yup

This war will end in a stalemate without US intervention.

It's clear now that the initial attack by Israel was meant to shock and awe the regime in Iran and lead to a regime change either through the death of high level leadership or internal strife. Since this has not happened the only way the nuclear installment at Fordow can be breached is with American heavy ordnance. Without this they cannot complete their objectives for the war and claim a victory.

Moreover, this American intervention is needed by Israel sooner than later due to the massive amount of money they're expending to keep up this pressure and defend from Iran.

Without American intervention Iran simply needs to continue existing and Israel will be forced to concede they cannot halt Iranian nuclear capability or else face continued iranian attrition missle attacks with a rapidly depleting inventory of interceptor missiles to defend with.

This is the current situation.

>>507925085
They require the US to step in if they have any chance of winning. It will just be an undecided stalemate otherwise, they can't afford to keep up this war or continually intercept missiles