>>512147812
Of course not, don't be daft. To determine the worth of a scientific paper you need to do a full search-up of all the authors and their institutions and funders, balance it mentally (no AI will do) and go with your gut after integrating and meditating on all the data. Knowing the various interests behind the actors and institutions.

I mean let's not be coy here. You can't just 'trust the data.'

>>512075164
>(((Bressan))) and (((Kramer)))
>pic related at the bottom
kek I'm not falling for your tricks Rabbi. Weston says it's fine and two Jews don't.