>>81575774
>So many black and white thinking robots. Brains allergic to nuance are low IQ. Also why you're a pathetic loser.
You're just a psude. It's not that complicated.

Corrilation implies 5 things:

1.) A causes B
2.) B causes A
3.) C causes both A and B.
4.) A and B corrilate due to coincidence
5.) The data is bad or skewed

These are comprehensive but not mutually exclusive. If you can rule out coincidence and bad data, then corrilation must imply some kind of causation, backward, forward, or from something else, or a mix.

Either way, I'm sick of progressives always excusing their nonsense with "nuance" because they're afraid of people having thought crimes. There's "nuance" so we just need to take their side and let the government and academia think for us in ways that are really not that hard. It undercuts democracy to go after people for thinking for themselves under the excuse of "nuance".

Telling people "It's too complicated. Trust us, bro" doesn't help people think for themselves and is especially bad when it's not really that complicated. "Nuance" is used as a shield against people who have "harmful thoughts"(thought crimes) that are true but disruptive, and the shield justifies itself because there are genuinely people out there who never bother learning the basics(or are deprived of learning the basics because it's too complicated) and we all have to suffer because of them.

I hate conservitves because they're outright stupid and don't give a shit about people. But I hate progressives even more because they're extremely manipulative for the same call to power and money as conservatives. Nobody sees anybody as humans these days, just bodily hosts for various harmful beliefs. I hate it.