Search Results
7/8/2025, 3:06:50 AM
7/7/2025, 11:18:49 AM
>>509726553
>He basically just said it’s more of a fandom than an actual vessel for any meaningful political change since normies will never ever vote for actual Nazis
Normies are literally sharing tiktoks of Dan Bilzerian rehabilitating Hitler as we speak. He's optics fucking.
>Like a lot of the Nazis are more attracted to the aesthetics and the history than anything else
Total strawman and he has never agreed to debate a single Natsoc (Joel Davis, Mark Collett, Radl) on the topic.
>The whole point about Nazism is that it was a spontaneous and contemporary response to the current political events of that time, it wasn’t just stealing the exact mechanisms of some previous failed political movement, it was actually creating something new
National Socialism was the core of the rebellion against modern liberalism and it's proponents were completely quashed out of the conversation for decades. If you know anything about the ideological underpinnings of the movement or read about it's belief system e.g
Through Tedor's book "Hitler's Revolution" you'd know it's EXTREMELY relevant to modern Western countries and not at all "dated" or a product of its time. In fact cucking on a national socialist movement is what we now know to be dated, as every single conservative political group that attempted this before and after WW1 was completely subverted by jewish ethnic networks and big finance.
>He basically just said it’s more of a fandom than an actual vessel for any meaningful political change since normies will never ever vote for actual Nazis
Normies are literally sharing tiktoks of Dan Bilzerian rehabilitating Hitler as we speak. He's optics fucking.
>Like a lot of the Nazis are more attracted to the aesthetics and the history than anything else
Total strawman and he has never agreed to debate a single Natsoc (Joel Davis, Mark Collett, Radl) on the topic.
>The whole point about Nazism is that it was a spontaneous and contemporary response to the current political events of that time, it wasn’t just stealing the exact mechanisms of some previous failed political movement, it was actually creating something new
National Socialism was the core of the rebellion against modern liberalism and it's proponents were completely quashed out of the conversation for decades. If you know anything about the ideological underpinnings of the movement or read about it's belief system e.g
Through Tedor's book "Hitler's Revolution" you'd know it's EXTREMELY relevant to modern Western countries and not at all "dated" or a product of its time. In fact cucking on a national socialist movement is what we now know to be dated, as every single conservative political group that attempted this before and after WW1 was completely subverted by jewish ethnic networks and big finance.
7/5/2025, 3:32:51 PM
Have you ever wondered what the Nazis were reading that galvanised them against the Jews? Well, now you don't have to. Here is an English translation of Theodor Fritsch's iconic book "Handbuch der Judenfrage" (handbook on the Jewish Question). It was considered required reading for NSDAP party members, alongside his other book "The Riddle of the Jews' Success", which deeply influenced Adolf Hitler himself when he was writing Mein Kampf. The book has never in history had an English translation published. So here are some translated snippets from this core element of Nazi views on Judaism in English.
>Three
>Two
>One
>BEGIN!
As early as 1781, Privy Councillor Dolim claimed that the deplorable characteristics of the Jews, which were merely the effects of constant oppression, would disappear with fair treatment, albeit only in the third generation1).
This assumption was supported by the teachings of the French naturalist Lamarck (d. 1829) on the inheritance of acquired characteristics. He explained that certain mental
dispositions, abilities and traits (good and bad) are created in individual humans by the environment and are then passed on from generation to generation.
Although the
most important representatives of science have recognized "Lamarckism" as a heresy , the Jews hold on to it.
Strange, most strange! –The most ardent representatives of the democratic idea of equality exclude themselves: All people are equal, the
white and black, the yellow and red; but for their leadership the Jewish people are "chosen" by God.–
1) Today, the fifth generation has lived since emancipation. Where is the change?
>Three
>Two
>One
>BEGIN!
As early as 1781, Privy Councillor Dolim claimed that the deplorable characteristics of the Jews, which were merely the effects of constant oppression, would disappear with fair treatment, albeit only in the third generation1).
This assumption was supported by the teachings of the French naturalist Lamarck (d. 1829) on the inheritance of acquired characteristics. He explained that certain mental
dispositions, abilities and traits (good and bad) are created in individual humans by the environment and are then passed on from generation to generation.
Although the
most important representatives of science have recognized "Lamarckism" as a heresy , the Jews hold on to it.
Strange, most strange! –The most ardent representatives of the democratic idea of equality exclude themselves: All people are equal, the
white and black, the yellow and red; but for their leadership the Jewish people are "chosen" by God.–
1) Today, the fifth generation has lived since emancipation. Where is the change?
Page 1