>>509377314
>Mutts are the only reason the USSR didn't get wrecked by Germany, they had no weapons left without US aid.
That's not quite true.
Lend lease helped Soviets greatly but
>it accounted for like 30% of their ordnance and provisions
It's a lot but far from "Soviets had nothing". Soviets had a massive military in terms of planes, tanks and so on, more than Germans at the start of Barbarossa
>Lend lease started coming in sufficient amounts AFTER Soviets won Barbarossa
And even then it accounted for like less than 15%. It was only by the end of 1943 it reached (almost) 30%.
It's likely Germans would lose anyway but the war would be longer and Soviets would have no obligations after so they'd take France too.
You fell for the Lend lease meme.
>Americans also financed Germany
The amount of German gear was in large thanx to American money.
Also, you could argue that without Soviets Americans wouldn't defeat Japan which surrendered not after nukes but after Soviets invaded Manchuria.
I'm not saying Japan would won but it's the same argument as for Soviet victory or defeat without Lend lease.
Also, if Germany defeated Soviets then they'd get all their resources and industry and would be unstoppable and Japan was with them
>evil jews who murdered dozens of millions of Aryans and are continuing to do so to this day with propaganda flyers on every single street alongside tranny flags
Communists weren't pro tranny, retard and Stalin didn't have blue hair. It's 100% Judeo American capitalist invention and also those "millions of Aryans" is bullshit.