Search Results
7/21/2025, 1:29:16 AM
>>716007036
>this is more akin to patenting tshirts
>someone else makes a sleeveless one
>and then you go back and add "whether it has sleeves or not"
Nigga, that is the point. This is not how patents are supposed to work. You CAN'T ADD 'even if' statements to patents, you are outstretching the claim. This never happens. The american consultant was shocked that Nintendo actually pulled this bullshit off and had it approved mid-lawsuit.
And the context where this change to the pattent is happening (calling it an addendum is acting on bad faith) makes it all worse, more suspicious and downright unfair. Hence why Pal devs are calling out Nintendo for moving goal posts.
>this is more akin to patenting tshirts
>someone else makes a sleeveless one
>and then you go back and add "whether it has sleeves or not"
Nigga, that is the point. This is not how patents are supposed to work. You CAN'T ADD 'even if' statements to patents, you are outstretching the claim. This never happens. The american consultant was shocked that Nintendo actually pulled this bullshit off and had it approved mid-lawsuit.
And the context where this change to the pattent is happening (calling it an addendum is acting on bad faith) makes it all worse, more suspicious and downright unfair. Hence why Pal devs are calling out Nintendo for moving goal posts.
Page 1