>>510803912
Nobody had a chance in highschool because youth marriage is defacto banned. Very few early relationships translate to marriage, and few of those have societal support. They're viewed as outliers and probably dangerous, if looked upon nostalgically in retrospect when things work out. But nobody is promoting young people to couple and marry at a young age.
This isn't just about sexual access. It's about the right kind of sexual access. Women left to their own devices destroy society. They don't get married. When they do they divorce. They don't have children. Or when they do they are raising their kids as single moms. That's where we are now. That's why we're having this conversation.
So, no, nobody had a chance in high school, least of all the teen girls to have a proper relationship. Nobody is helping young people couple up. On the contrary, every force aligns itself against that possibility. And if kids manage to have sex, it has to be off the record or people are going to jail.
> you can have sex, but only if
> lists 100 obstacles
> "Sorry anon, but you missed your opportunity!"
When I was a kid I was lectured for having porn and masturbating. Where was the support? Where is the support for socially awkward kids who can't figure it out and need help? Where is PFLAG for getting kids laid? You won't find it. All you find is hysteria and anger and violence and police state tactics.

Meanwhile, browns are all high on lean and fucking on Instagram and nobody cares. This is a WHITE problem which is why it requires a WHITE solution.