>>714863354
>Are Brits still dependent on Americans?
To an even worse degree. Americans literally build and maintain the nuclear-armed trident submarine missiles which form Britain's ONLY nuclear deterrent. The British military is LITERALLY not allowed to open up the nuke missiles that it allegedly controls.
>>714863612
>No they didn't, there is no proof
The CIA asked the Australian government to dismiss Whitlam.
>the CIA magically compelled the Australian public to overwhelmingly vote in the Liberals in the next election?
Losing an election doesn't justify your overthrow after the fact.
>>714863646
I'm right-wing, I never said I liked Whitlam. Regardless of Whitlam's policies, Australia's old colonial master and its current imperial master colluded to overthrow its democratically elected prime minister. And in the decades since America has cemented its economic and cultural hegemony over Australia