>>509058778
>Pre-colonialism differences in development are more reflective of geography and other such material conditions, not inherent differences in intelligence.
Africa is the most resource rich continent in the world mate. They had all the material conditions required to do literally anything they wanted. But they didn't. When apartheid was abolished in South Africa the White government handed over a mostly functioning state with little corruption. Twenty years later and South Africa was a corrupt, crime-ridden, broken embarrassment.

>video
I'm not watching this leftist cope. People clearly have pathological altruism for blacks because of their lack of physical achievements as a racial group and this fictional oppression narrative, so they blame the material conditions and colonialism despite it not being congruent with other racial groups that endured exactly the same and worse. Notice you didn't even address any of my previous points. When pressed about it you say "um well ackshually" and provide absolutely no substance to the original claim. Again, outside of the coastlines, Africa was practically Neolithic before Europeans arrived. Blaming it on colonialism is just a cope. Children in Kenya and other African countries still fail the mirror test at six years old. Babies in America and Britain pass around 18 months.

>>509058915
>actually links to Wikipedia
Holy fucking KEK!